Prostitution, while a permanent, ineradicable and arguably even necessary accessory to communal life, is an ignoble line of work and inherently unworthy of social respect. Legalization won’t change that. -Barbara KayBarbara Kay insists that the dirty little whores must continue to be treated like dirty little whores by the law, even if prostitution is 'a permanent, ineradicable and arguably even necessary accessory to communal life' and even if the laws struck down have been found to seriously endanger the health, safety and lives of the people engaging in this 'permanent, ineradicable and arguably even necessary accessory to communal life'
She's also very concerned that she will soon no longer be allowed to look down her nose at the dirty little whores.
Speaking of consequences, I’m taking the opportunity to call prostitution a dehumanizing and morally degraded behaviour now, because I think my right to do so won’t long continue. Since activists are already using the vocabulary of other “rights” and “equality” battles, I predict we’ll soon have to watch our judgmental language on this front. Once prostitution has been legally/morally airbrushed by the SCC, it will be deemed “offensive,” “excluding” and “intolerant” to hurt the feelings of prostitutes. Don’t be surprised if the next time you call a whore a whore, you’re hauled up before a Human Rights Commission for prostitutophobia.
See:
Barbara Kay clutches her pearls and
Before and After
UPDATE:
UPDATE: Legal or not, prostitution continues, but an Australian study shows that decriminalization does increase safety for sex workers.
2 comments:
These people claim that prostitution is dehumanizing and degrading - which I think most people agree is often the case - but then their solution is... to further degrade and dehumanize prostitutes.
They absolutely refuse to engage with the Judge's carefully reasoned and justified finding that the overturned laws directly lead to harm, abuse and death.
Much as she'd like to, Barbara Kay and her ilk can never admit what they really believe; that the lives of these women are less important than the cosmetic expression of social disapproval that the laws provide.
It's like the homophobes who argue that gays are promiscuous and immoral - but also oppose their right to commit to one other person for the rest of their life - or 'pro-lifers' who are opposed to abortion and birth control.
They insist we respect their morality, but I have no use for those opposed to rain and umbrellas.
Post a Comment