Will America respect the Iraqi democracy they say they invaded to create?On Tuesday, without note in the U.S. media (my emphasis), more than half of the members of Iraq's parliament rejected the continuing occupation of their country. 144 lawmakers signed onto a legislative petition calling on the United States to set a timetable for withdrawal, according to Nassar Al-Rubaie, a spokesman for the Al Sadr movement, the nationalist Shia group that sponsored the petition.
It's a hugely significant development. Lawmakers demanding an end to the occupation now have the upper hand in the Iraqi legislature for the first time; previous attempts at a similar resolution fell just short of the 138 votes needed to pass (there are 275 members of the Iraqi parliament, but many have fled the country's civil conflict, and at times it's been difficult to arrive at a quorum).
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
Majority of Iraqi parliament want Americans out
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Julian Assange is in jail in UK facing deportation to Sweden on charges of rape. Many people, otherwise sympathetic to Assange and Wikileak...
-
Octopuses are smarter than they should be. Every other invertebrate registers as static on an EEG. An Octopus generates the kind of slow l...
-
For the comic book fans, hat tip to Andrew Sullivan : Frank Miller is the comic book artist and writer behind The Dark Knight, a bunch of gr...
-
Tragic News For Albertans You bastards. You lousy bastards. The Alberta provincial government has outlawed $1 drink specials and limited Ha...
-
The pathologically sadistic and demented Harper government has now gone so far they managed to shock the conscience of Saskatchwan's rig...
-
Ottawa Police officer Steve Desjourdy appears to have a serious problem with any woman who gets 'uppity' with him. On Wednesday, ...
-
The context: Ezra Levant spits venom at the doctor who brought attention to increased cancer rates downstream from the tarsands. Antonia...
-
Spotted at Scott's Dia Tribes : Rachel Marsden , serial stalker, Anne Coulter wannabe, former Fox News personality fired for being too...
-
More evidence that many police officers extend their 'us and them' attitude to all of us not just criminals. A woman who was bound ...
-
For sheer, literally lethal awfulness in a working environment, you just can't beat the privatized telecom industry. I spent five yea...
1 comment:
Excerpt from Lawrence Martin in Globe and Mail article, "On war, a little diplomacy couldn't hurt
Peace talks with the Taliban? Not if you're waiting for a push from Canada."
Tuesday's senate decision was, in part, motivated by escalating discontent over civilian casualties at the hands of foreign forces. Yesterday, right on the heels of the vote, 21 more civilians were killed by U.S. air strikes.
As could be predicted, the Afghan diplomatic push got a ho-hum reception in Canada. Not one party leader in Question Period picked up on it. Although impetus for negotiations with the Taliban is gaining in many quarters - even among some U.S. Republicans - don't look to Ottawa. Canada used to lead the way on such peace initiatives; now we take a back seat.
The Liberals, once our foremost advocates of the diplomatic solution, have not been heard. The governing Conservatives, so enamoured of people in uniform, are not terribly interested. It is left to the NDP's Jack Layton to carry the banner of negotiation and diplomacy. And for his troubles, he is derided as "Taliban Jack."
So it will be once again, "Diplomatic Jack," left to do the heavy lifting.
Post a Comment