Thirty years after the medical community abandoned the idea, Pentagon documents still refer to homosexuality as a 'mental disorder'.
Well hey, they might have a point. Clearly the US military needs more healthy, responsible, clean-minded drug addicts, torturers, murderers and the severely autistic.
But no fags. That would just be sick.
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Octopuses are smarter than they should be. Every other invertebrate registers as static on an EEG. An Octopus generates the kind of slow l... -
Julian Assange is in jail in UK facing deportation to Sweden on charges of rape. Many people, otherwise sympathetic to Assange and Wikileak... -
Conservative MP Brad Trost believes female politicians should be bullied and terrorized and threatened with jailing for believing in differe... -
'Emboldened.' In every article about white nationalists or the 'Alt right', two terms designed specifically to obscure... -
I think we should start a movement to protect against the insidious threat of 'Ten Commandments law'. Sure the Christians and Jewis...
-
The Christian Labour Association of Canada, not to put too fine a point on it, is a fake union. They're an association with no standing...
-
Spotted at Scott's Dia Tribes : Rachel Marsden , serial stalker, Anne Coulter wannabe, former Fox News personality fired for being too... -
For the comic book fans, hat tip to Andrew Sullivan : Frank Miller is the comic book artist and writer behind The Dark Knight, a bunch of gr... -
The day before a massacre at a Quebec Mosque Kellie Leitch attacked a motion opposing Islamophobia as 'special privileges'. Pres... -
We can't count on liberals and their cherished institutions or standard of decorum and responsible governance they keep hoping against ...
4 comments:
I find it rather interresting how, that if I am for or against abortion or capital punishment, I am simply on one side or the other. If I am pro homosexuality, I am deemed as progressive, and fighting for rights and freedoms. HOwever,if I oppose it, I am labeled a bigot and oppressor of freedom. Puzzles the heck out of me why I cant just disagree with it based on my moral and social values and let that be that.
Don't approve of homosexuality? Fine, don't have sex with guys.
Oppose gays having equal rights - including the same right you and I have to marry the person we love - and you are being bigoted and you are oppressing freedom.
Here's the thing Richard, the quiet reasonable sounding folks who opposed desegregation, opposed mixed marriage and claimed it was because of states rights, religion or (pseudo) science are remembered on the same page in the history books as the ones lynching people and burning crosses.
You're on the wrong side of history and of demographics here.
I wonder what richard cranium thinks about Bull Conner?
Richard's a good guy and I certainly was not suggesting he's a vicious bigot like Bull Conner was - just trying to make a point about changing standards of what constitutes bigotry.
Post a Comment